Stay on COVID-19 vaccination mandate remains in place as case moves to 6th Circuit Court of Appeals

by | Nov 19, 2021 | Insights, Labor and Employment

The below information is current as of the publication date listed. Because COVID-19 response measures on all fronts are continually evolving, clients should stay alert to new developments and consult with counsel on any critical questions.

On November 13, 2021, the 5th Circuit reaffirmed its stay of the Biden Administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for private employers. The Court ordered that OSHA shall “take no steps to implement or enforce the Mandate until further court order.” The appeals court initially issued an emergency stay on enforcement of the rule on November 6 before affirming that decision last week.

A number of states and employers initially moved to stay the mandate and collectively filed lawsuits in each of the twelve circuit courts nationwide. These similar lawsuits filed across the country triggered the Multicircuit Petition Statute, 28 U.S.C. 2112(a), which requires the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) choose randomly one appellate court to hear all cases. The 6th Circuit was selected and will now decide all issues related to the mandate. The Court, which covers Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, and Michigan, is comprised of 11 Republican-appointed judges, with five appointed by Democratic presidents.

In an effort to expedite the matter, petitions for an initial hearing “en banc” were filed with the 6th Circuit. The legal term en banc refers to the hearing of a case by the entire bench, or all of the judges of a court, rather than a panel of a selected few judges. Typically, most cases are tried before a single judge or (as contemplated in this case) before a three-judge panel in the circuit court of appeals. Granting an en banc petition immediately would accelerate determination of the matter since it would eliminate the need for a subsequent petition for en banc rehearing from a three-judge panel. However, petitions for initial hearings en banc are rarely granted. The court has called for a response from OSHA to the petitions by November 30, 2021.

According to its website, OSHA announced it would “suspend activities related to the implementation and enforcement of the [Emergency Temporary Standard] pending future developments in the litigation.” However, the Biden administration is still urging businesses to require their employees to get vaccinated and has indicated they still believe January 4, 2022 to be the compliance deadline.

While it seems unlikely this matter will be resolved imminently, or that the mandate will pass legal muster, employers should be prepared for the implications in the event it is deemed enforceable.

Seek legal advice before implementing policy mandates or responding to enforcement action

Knowledgeable legal counsel can be critical for navigating today’s challenging regulatory environment for employers. Saxton & Stump’s Labor and Employment team, led by attorney Richard L. Hackman, is available to assist and has extensive experience representing and counseling entities of all sizes and types including healthcare organizations, manufacturers, retailers and service industry businesses. Saxton & Stump also provides businesses with legal services for their industry whether it is Construction, Hospitality, Healthcare, Senior Care Services or Banking and Financial Services. Our focus is helping our clients achieve their business goals.

Media Center

Stay In Touch

Stay informed with firm updates, legal news, and industry resources.

Lancaster

280 Granite Run Drive, Suite #300
Lancaster, PA 17601
Phone: (717) 556-1000
Fax: (717) 441-3810

Harrisburg

4250 Crums Mill Road, Suite #201
Harrisburg, PA 17112
Phone: (717) 216-5505
Fax: (717) 547-1900

Malvern

100 Deerfield Lane, Suite #240
Malvern, PA 19355
Phone: (484) 328-8500
Fax: (484) 713-5241

Charleston

151 Meeting Street, Suite #350
Charleston, SC 29401
Phone: (843) 414-5080
Fax: (843) 580-8303

Send us a message

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This